How to Use Open Source Software in Enterprises Without Violating Licenses

Using open source software (OSS) in an enterprise can be immensely valuable, but it's essential to navigate open source licenses carefully to avoid potential compliance issues and legal challenges. This article will break down the major types of open source licenses, provide guidelines on how to use OSS effectively, and offer best practices for enterprises.

---

Understanding Open Source Licenses

Open source licenses generally fall into two broad categories: permissive licenses and copyleft licenses.

1. Permissive Licenses

• Examples: MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD
• Characteristics: Permissive licenses allow users to freely use, modify, and distribute the software, often with minimal restrictions. They generally permit integration with proprietary software without requiring the source code to be disclosed.
• Implications: These licenses are often considered "enterprise-friendly" because they provide flexibility in usage and don’t impose many constraints on distribution.

2. Copyleft Licenses

• Examples: GNU General Public License (GPL), Affero GPL (AGPL), Lesser GPL (LGPL)
• Characteristics: Copyleft licenses are more restrictive. They require any distributed software that incorporates code licensed under these terms to also be open source under the same license, with full source code disclosure.
• Implications: For enterprises, the copyleft requirement can be problematic if they want to keep their own source code private or integrate the OSS with proprietary software. Using copyleft-licensed code without adhering to its terms can lead to legal liabilities.

3. Public Domain and Unlicensed Software

• Examples: Unlicensed software, software with a Public Domain dedication (like CC0)
• Characteristics: Public domain software has no copyright restrictions. Developers can use, modify, and distribute it without restriction.
• Implications: Although public domain software is free from license constraints, enterprises should still vet the software for quality, security, and long-term support.

---

Best Practices for Using Open Source Software in the Enterprise

1. Develop an Open Source Policy

• Define Objectives: Clearly outline why your organization uses OSS (e.g., to accelerate development, reduce costs).
• Identify Approved Licenses: Decide which licenses are acceptable based on their legal implications. Permissive licenses like MIT, BSD, and Apache are generally safer choices.
• Define Compliance Protocols: Include requirements for code reviews, documentation, and compliance checks before OSS can be used or integrated into products.

2. Understand and Categorize License Risks

• Assess Compatibility: For software that will be redistributed, confirm that OSS licenses are compatible with the software’s intended use. Be particularly cautious when dealing with GPL and AGPL licenses.
• Flag High-Risk Licenses: Identify "high-risk" licenses that could affect intellectual property rights (e.g., AGPL, GPL) and require special approval for use.

3. Implement an OSS Review and Approval Process

• Create an Approval Workflow: Require developers to submit OSS for review before using it in production code. A centralized OSS review team can evaluate license terms and assess potential risks.
• Track OSS Usage: Maintain an inventory of all open source components used in each project. This practice, often referred to as a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), can help in compliance and security audits.

4. Monitor License Changes in Dependencies

• Use Dependency Scanners: Many OSS projects regularly update their dependencies, and the licenses associated with these dependencies can change. Use tools to scan dependencies for license changes to ensure ongoing compliance.
• Implement Automation Tools: Tools like FOSSA, WhiteSource, and Snyk automate the identification and tracking of OSS licenses and can flag potential issues.

5. Contribute Back Cautiously

• Understand License Impact: When contributing to OSS, ensure your organization is comfortable with the project's licensing terms. For example, contributing to a GPL-licensed project may require your contributions to be licensed under the GPL as well.
• Adopt an OSS Contribution Policy: Outline guidelines for employees on how to contribute to open source projects, including review procedures to confirm contributions are in alignment with the company’s interests.

6. Use Dual-Licensing to Protect Proprietary Software

• Separate OSS from Proprietary Code: When possible, create clear boundaries between proprietary and open source code to prevent copyleft provisions from "infecting" proprietary software.
• Consider Dual Licensing: In cases where OSS must be integrated closely with proprietary code, dual licensing allows you to offer the same software under both an open source and a commercial license.

---

Common OSS Licensing Issues and How to Address Them

Issue 1: Including Copyleft OSS in Proprietary Products

• Solution: Avoid incorporating copyleft-licensed OSS directly into proprietary software unless the OSS is isolated in a way that does not trigger the license’s sharing requirement. Consult legal experts if necessary.

Issue 2: Using OSS in a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) Model

• Solution: AGPL and similar licenses specifically address SaaS use cases by extending copyleft provisions. Consider alternatives if the OSS license could require open-sourcing modifications in a SaaS environment.

Issue 3: Failure to Attribute or Disclose Source Code

• Solution: Ensure compliance with attribution requirements by providing proper credit in documentation or within the software interface. For licenses that require source code disclosure, provide access to the code according to the license terms.

---

Practical Example: Using Open Source in an Enterprise Web Application

Consider a scenario where an enterprise is building a web application that leverages various open source libraries for features like user authentication, data visualization, and logging. Here’s how an enterprise can ensure compliance:

1. Identify and Vet Libraries: Each library is evaluated based on functionality and licensing terms. Permissive-licensed libraries (e.g., MIT, Apache) are preferred for core functionalities, while GPL or AGPL libraries are avoided unless they are isolated in non-proprietary components.

2. Monitor and Document: All OSS libraries are tracked in an SBOM. The application is scanned regularly to ensure no license violations occur due to dependency changes.

3. Implement Attribution: For licenses that require attribution, acknowledgments are included in the application's documentation and About section.

4. Consult Legal Experts: Before any significant modifications are made to OSS components, legal counsel is consulted to confirm compliance with license requirements.

---

Conclusion

Open source software is a powerful resource for enterprises, but understanding and adhering to licensing terms is essential to avoid legal and compliance issues. By following best practices such as developing a robust OSS policy, conducting thorough license reviews, monitoring OSS usage, and consulting legal expertise, enterprises can maximize the benefits of OSS while minimizing risks. Remember that clear documentation and proactive compliance monitoring are key to maintaining open source integrity and ensuring smooth, long-term OSS usage.

Contact Sodaru Technologies to get help in Implementing the Standard Operating Procedure(SOP) to deal with the Open Source Licenses proactively.